Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Penalises any single weak metric.
What the model believes about Mazda without web search.
Frequency × prominence across organic category prompts.
Measures what GPT-5 believes about Mazda from training alone, before any web search. We probe the model 5 times across 5 different angles and score 5 sub-signals.
High overlap with brand prompts shows Mazda is firmly in the model's "subcompact suv" category.
Unprompted recall on 15 high-volume discovery prompts, run 5 times each in pure recall mode (no web). Brands that surface here are baked into the model's training, not borrowed from live search.
| Discovery prompt | Volume | Appeared | Positions (5 runs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best subcompact SUVs right now? | 6,600 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
| Which subcompact SUV models are most popular? | 0 | 5/5 | 6, 3, 3, 4, 3 |
| What are the top-rated subcompact SUVs? | 140 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
| What are the best subcompact SUV options for city driving? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 2, 2, 1, 1 |
| Which subcompact SUVs are considered the most reliable? | 0 | 5/5 | 3, 3, 3, 3, 2 |
| What are the best subcompact SUVs for families? | 0 | 5/5 | 3, 1, 3, 1, 2 |
| What are the best fuel-efficient subcompact SUVs? | 0 | 4/5 | 4, 5, 4, 4 |
| Which subcompact SUVs have the most cargo space? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best all-around subcompact SUVs? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 2, 1 |
| What subcompact SUVs are easiest to park? | 0 | 4/5 | 5, 4, 5, 7 |
| What are the best subcompact SUVs for first-time buyers? | 0 | 5/5 | 3, 2, 1, 3, 3 |
| What are the best affordable subcompact SUVs? | 170 | 5/5 | 6, 6, 3, 3, 1 |
| Which subcompact SUVs are the best value? | 0 | 3/5 | 1, 3, 7 |
| What are the best subcompact SUVs for winter driving? | 0 | 5/5 | 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 |
| What are the best subcompact SUVs to buy? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
This report focuses on Subcompact SUVs because that is where Mazda scores highest. The model also evaluates it against the industries below, with their own prompts and competitor sets. Click any industry for its full leaderboard.
Generated automatically from gaps and weaknesses in the analysis above, ranked by potential impact on the AI Visibility Score.
You score 67 on recall but only 37 on retrieval (gap of +30.5). Training-data authority is outpacing your current web footprint. Publish fresh, well-cited content to keep search-augmented responses including your brand.
Close the fragility gapYour LBA is strong. Focus on maintaining authoritative coverage and ensuring new product launches get independent reviews within 12 months of release.
Maintain current LBACore TOM is strong. Watch for specific differentiators (slogans, signature products) that appear in only some iterations. Push those into training-data-crawled headlines.
Maintain / refine TOMOther brands in the Subcompact SUVs industry, ranked by overall AI Visibility Score.
Every score on this page is reproducible. Below is exactly what we ran and how we computed each number.
(LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Each sub-signal is on a 0-1 scale. Read the full LBA methodology →
Analysis run on April 23, 2026 at 3:43 AM
Click a prompt to expand its responses. 210 total responses across 72 prompts.