Measures what GPT-5 believes about Hopper from training alone, before any web search. We probe the model 5 times across 5 different angles and score 5 sub-signals.
High overlap with brand prompts shows Hopper is firmly in the model's "metasearch site" category.
Unprompted recall on 15 high-volume discovery prompts, run 5 times each in pure recall mode (no web). Brands that surface here are baked into the model's training, not borrowed from live search.
| Discovery prompt | Volume | Appeared | Positions (5 runs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best metasearch sites for comparing flights and hotels? | 0 | 3/5 | 5, 5, 9 |
| What are the most popular metasearch sites for travel bookings? | 0 | 1/5 | 8 |
| Which metasearch sites are best for finding cheap flights? | 0 | 3/5 | 5, 6, 5 |
| What are the top metasearch sites for hotels? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which metasearch sites are most recommended for package deals? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best travel metasearch sites for booking discounts? | 10 | 5/5 | 5, 8, 7, 6, 8 |
| Which metasearch sites are best for comparing airfare prices? | 33,100 | 3/5 | 5, 5, 5 |
| What are the best metasearch sites for international travel? | 0 | 3/5 | 5, 8, 11 |
| Which metasearch sites are best for last-minute travel deals? | 0 | 5/5 | 5, 8, 5, 5, 7 |
| What are the top travel comparison sites for flights and hotels? | 720 | 0/5 | — |
| Which metasearch sites are best for booking vacation packages? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the most trusted metasearch sites for travel planning? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which metasearch sites are best for finding the lowest hotel rates? | 320 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best metasearch sites for family travel? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which metasearch sites are best overall for travel price comparison? | 0 | 2/5 | 6, 6 |
This report focuses on Metasearch Sites because that is where Hopper scores highest. The model also evaluates it against the industries below, with their own prompts and competitor sets. Click any industry for its full leaderboard.
Generated automatically from gaps and weaknesses in the analysis above, ranked by potential impact on the AI Visibility Score.
Your Authority is low across category queries. Users asking about your category do not see you. Priority: get listed in "best of" and "top N" articles for your category on domains with strong training-data crawl presence.
+10 to +25 on AuthorityYou score 18 on recall but only 0 on retrieval (gap of +18.1). Training-data authority is outpacing your current web footprint. Publish fresh, well-cited content to keep search-augmented responses including your brand.
Close the fragility gapYour TOM is solid on specialty queries but weaker on broad category questions. Seed content that frames your brand in the exact phrasing users use in broad queries, not just your specialty sub-category.
+5 to +15 on TOMYour LBA is strong. Focus on maintaining authoritative coverage and ensuring new product launches get independent reviews within 12 months of release.
Maintain current LBAOther brands in the Metasearch Sites industry, ranked by overall AI Visibility Score.
Every score on this page is reproducible. Below is exactly what we ran and how we computed each number.
(LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Each sub-signal is on a 0-1 scale. Read the full LBA methodology →
Analysis run on April 23, 2026 at 3:11 AM
Click a prompt to expand its responses. 210 total responses across 72 prompts.