Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Penalises any single weak metric.
Measures what GPT-5 believes about Bungol from training alone, before any web search. We probe the model 5 times across 5 different angles and score 5 sub-signals.
High overlap with brand prompts shows Bungol is firmly in the model's "regional listing site" category.
Unprompted recall on 15 high-volume discovery prompts, run 5 times each in pure recall mode (no web). Brands that surface here are baked into the model's training, not borrowed from live search.
| Discovery prompt | Volume | Appeared | Positions (5 runs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best regional listing sites for finding homes in a specific area? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which regional listing sites are most popular for local real estate searches? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the top regional listing sites for apartment and home listings? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Can you recommend the best regional listing sites for a specific state or province? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What local property listing sites are worth using for a metro area? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which regional real estate listing sites have the most complete local inventory? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the most recommended regional listing sites for homebuyers? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which regional listing sites are best for searching neighborhood homes? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best local listing websites for buying property in one region? | 10 | 0/5 | — |
| What regional listing sites do people use to compare homes in one area? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Can you list the top property listing sites focused on local markets? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which regional listing sites are best for finding housing in a city or state? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the most trusted regional listing sites for real estate searches? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which regional listing platforms are best for localized property data? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best regional real estate sites for finding listings near me? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
Generated automatically from gaps and weaknesses in the analysis above, ranked by potential impact on the AI Visibility Score.
Your LBA is low. The model has limited or no specific beliefs about your brand. Focus on authoritative third-party coverage: Wikipedia, industry-specific publications, founder interviews on podcasts with transcripts, and "best of" list articles.
+10 to +25 on LBA over 12-24 monthsYour Authority is low across category queries. Users asking about your category do not see you. Priority: get listed in "best of" and "top N" articles for your category on domains with strong training-data crawl presence.
+10 to +25 on AuthorityThe model does not recall your brand in category queries. Start with authoritative coverage and category-list inclusion. TOM moves slowly, tied to major model training cycles (typically 12-18 months).
+10 to +30 on TOM over 12-24 monthsOther brands in the Regional Listing Sites industry, ranked by overall AI Visibility Score.
Every score on this page is reproducible. Below is exactly what we ran and how we computed each number.
(LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Each sub-signal is on a 0-1 scale. Read the full LBA methodology →
Analysis run on April 23, 2026 at 4:33 AM
Click a prompt to expand its responses. 210 total responses across 72 prompts.