Industry Report

Yoga & Pilates Apparel

Brands focused on soft, flexible, and high-comfort clothing specifically designed for yoga, pilates, and low-impact studio workouts.

Brands tracked: 42
Brands analyzed: 42
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 317
Total responses: 1,645
Top Brand Overall?
Lululemon
92/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Nike
94

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
Lululemon
89

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Lululemon
100

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Lululemon is the default answer in AI responses for Yoga & Pilates Apparel

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Yoga & Pilates Apparel, Lululemon is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. ALO is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 42 Yoga & Pilates Apparel brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 317 shared Yoga & Pilates Apparel prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 317 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →