Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Wiki Platforms

Collaborative web-based platforms that allow teams to create, edit, and interlink pages for shared documentation, policies, and project information.

Brands tracked: 33
Brands analyzed: 33
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 263
Total responses: 304
Top Brand Overall?
Notion
5/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Notion
0

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Notion
96

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Notion
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Wiki Platforms is an emerging or highly fragmented category

No brand in Wiki Platforms scored above 40 on overall AI visibility. That means AI assistants do not currently recommend specific brands for this category with any consistency. Either the category is too new or too regional for the models to have converged on a default set of answers, or the queries users ask don't lend themselves to brand-specific responses.

Brand Leaderboard All 33 Wiki Platforms brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Notion
notion.so
 0
96
100
5
2
Slab
slab.com
 0
35
58
3
3
BookStack
bookstackapp.com
 0
27
41
2
4
GitBook
gitbook.com
 0
12
32
2
5
Guru
getguru.com
 0
16
59
2
6
MediaWiki
mediawiki.org
 0
17
47
2
7
Nuclino
nuclino.com
 0
28
43
2
8
Atlassian
atlassian.com
 0
4
16
1
9
Document360
document360.com
 0
3
18
1
10
DokuWiki
dokuwiki.org
 0
4
12
1
11
Microsoft
microsoft.com
 0
5
28
1
12
Slite
slite.com
 0
5
19
1
13
Archbee
archbee.com
 0
0
0
0
14
Bloomfire
bloomfire.com
 0
0
0
0
15
BlueSpice
bluespice.com
 0
0
0
0
16
Coda
coda.io
 0
1
11
0
17
eXo Platform
exoplatform.com
 0
0
0
0
18
Fandom
fandom.com
 0
0
0
0
19
Foswiki
foswiki.org
 0
0
0
0
20
Helpjuice
helpjuice.com
 0
0
0
0
21
Kipwise
kipwise.com
 0
0
0
0
22
Miraheze
miraheze.org
 0
0
0
0
23
MoinMoin
moinmo.in
 0
0
0
0
24
Outline
getoutline.com
 0
1
9
0
25
Papyrs
papyrs.com
 0
0
0
0
26
PBworks
pbworks.com
 0
0
0
0
27
PmWiki
pmwiki.org
 0
0
0
0
28
Tettra
tettra.com
 0
0
4
0
29
TiddlyWiki
tiddlywiki.com
 0
0
1
0
30
TWiki
twiki.org
 0
0
0
0
31
W
Wiki.js
wikijs.org
 0
1
4
0
32
Wikidot
wikidot.com
 0
0
0
0
33
XWiki
xwiki.com
 0
0
3
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 263 shared Wiki Platforms prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 263 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →