Streaming ETL Services
Real-time data pipelines that ingest, process, and route streaming data for low-latency analytics and operational use cases.
Confluent is the default answer in AI responses for Streaming ETL Services
When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Streaming ETL Services, Confluent is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. Google is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.
Brand Leaderboard All 36 Streaming ETL Services brands ranked
Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.
| # | Brand | LBA | Authority | TOM | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 Confluent
confluent.io
|
87 | 81 | 92 | 87 |
| 2 |
 Google
google.com
|
81 | 40 | 73 | 62 |
| 3 |
 Apache Flink
flink.apache.org
|
87 | 35 | 59 | 56 |
| 4 |
 Fivetran
fivetran.com
|
75 | 30 | 58 | 51 |
| 5 |
 Databricks
databricks.com
|
92 | 24 | 38 | 44 |
| 6 |
 Apache Kafka
kafka.apache.org
|
99 | 12 | 46 | 37 |
| 7 |
 Airbyte
airbyte.com
|
68 | 18 | 33 | 34 |
| 8 |
 Amazon
amazon.com
|
86 | 11 | 40 | 33 |
| 9 |
 Debezium
debezium.io
|
74 | 7 | 21 | 22 |
| 10 |
 Materialize
materialize.com
|
59 | 5 | 25 | 20 |
| 11 |
 Snowflake
snowflake.com
|
83 | 3 | 23 | 17 |
| 12 |
 Estuary
estuary.dev
|
54 | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| 13 |
 Matillion
matillion.com
|
59 | 1 | 23 | 10 |
| 14 |
 Redpanda
redpanda.com
|
74 | 1 | 19 | 10 |
| 15 |
 StreamSets
streamsets.com
|
76 | 1 | 17 | 10 |
| 16 |
 Hevo Data
hevodata.com
|
68 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 17 |
 Qlik
qlik.com
|
75 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| 18 |
 Talend
talend.com
|
73 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| 19 |
 Microsoft
microsoft.com
|
98 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 20 |
 Rivery
rivery.io
|
47 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 21 |
 RudderStack
rudderstack.com
|
70 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 22 |
 StreamNative
streamnative.io
|
60 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 23 |
 Striim
striim.com
|
67 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 24 |
 Aiven
aiven.io
|
61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 |
 Bytewax
bytewax.io
|
41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 |
 DataCater
datacater.io
|
33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 |
 Decodable
decodable.co
|
48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 |
 Hazelcast
hazelcast.com
|
68 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 |
 Instaclustr
instaclustr.com
|
40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 |
 Lenses
lenses.io
|
35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 |
M
Memphis
memphis.dev
|
34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 |
 PeerDB
peerdb.io
|
31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 |
 Quix
quix.io
|
44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 |
 Tinybird
tinybird.co
|
64 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 |
U
Upsolver
upsolver.com
|
47 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 |
 WarpStream
warpstream.com
|
49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
How is this calculated? Methodology
Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 281 shared Streaming ETL Services prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.
Overall AI Visibility Score
(LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →