Staffing & Agency Applicant Systems
ATS products built for staffing agencies and recruitment firms featuring rapid candidate placement workflows, bulk submittals, client portals, and billing integrations.
Bullhorn is the default answer in AI responses for Staffing & Agency Applicant Systems
When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Staffing & Agency Applicant Systems, Bullhorn is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. JobAdder is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.
Brand Leaderboard All 34 Staffing & Agency Applicant Systems brands ranked
Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.
| # | Brand | LBA | Authority | TOM | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 Bullhorn
bullhorn.com
|
68 | 98 | 100 | 87 |
| 2 |
 JobAdder
jobadder.com
|
67 | 27 | 67 | 50 |
| 3 |
 Vincere
vincere.io
|
55 | 26 | 76 | 48 |
| 4 |
 Avionté
avionte.com
|
47 | 35 | 58 | 46 |
| 5 |
 CEIPAL
ceipal.com
|
60 | 18 | 31 | 33 |
| 6 |
 Recruit CRM
recruitcrm.io
|
74 | 15 | 27 | 32 |
| 7 |
 Crelate
crelate.com
|
36 | 13 | 43 | 28 |
| 8 |
 Zoho
zoho.com
|
72 | 12 | 24 | 28 |
| 9 |
 Loxo
loxo.co
|
50 | 8 | 39 | 27 |
| 10 |
 JobDiva
jobdiva.com
|
65 | 7 | 14 | 20 |
| 11 |
 Greenhouse
greenhouse.com
|
76 | 8 | 8 | 19 |
| 12 |
 Lever
lever.co
|
80 | 8 | 8 | 19 |
| 13 |
 TempWorks
tempworks.com
|
51 | 5 | 17 | 18 |
| 14 |
 Tracker
tracker-rms.com
|
24 | 8 | 28 | 18 |
| 15 |
 Recruiterflow
recruiterflow.com
|
70 | 7 | 7 | 17 |
| 16 |
 iCIMS
icims.com
|
67 | 7 | 7 | 16 |
| 17 |
 PCRecruiter
pcrecruiter.net
|
62 | 6 | 8 | 16 |
| 18 |
 Manatal
manatal.com
|
55 | 5 | 5 | 14 |
| 19 |
 Invenias
invenias.com
|
54 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 20 |
 Top Echelon
topechelon.com
|
48 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 21 |
 Firefish
firefishsoftware.com
|
39 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 22 |
 TargetRecruit
targetrecruit.com
|
37 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 23 |
 Eploy
eploy.co.uk
|
33 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 24 |
 Cluen
cluen.com
|
30 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| 25 |
 RecruitBPM
recruitbpm.com
|
30 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| 26 |
A
AkkenCloud
akkencloud.com
|
25 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 27 |
 Exelare
exelare.com
|
25 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 28 |
 Big Biller
bigbiller.com
|
12 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 29 |
M
Mercury xRM
mercuryxrm.com
|
12 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 30 |
 SmartSearch
smartsearchonline.com
|
14 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 31 |
B
Bond Adapt
bondadapt.com
|
6 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 32 |
 MatchMaker Software
matchmakersoftware.com
|
5 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 33 |
 FastTrack360
fasttrack360.com
|
2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 |
V
Voyager Infinity
voyager-software.com
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
How is this calculated? Methodology
Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 269 shared Staffing & Agency Applicant Systems prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.
Overall AI Visibility Score
composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →