Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Specialty Telehealth Clinics

Telemedicine providers focused on specific medical specialties—such as mental health, dermatology, sexual health, or endocrinology—delivering remote consultations and treatment.

Brands tracked: 39
Brands analyzed: 39
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 299
Total responses: 1,540
Top Brand Overall?
Teladoc
49/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Nurx
79

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
Teladoc
20

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Hims
79

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Specialty Telehealth Clinics is a highly fragmented category in AI responses

Even the top-ranked brand (Teladoc at 49/100) is mentioned inconsistently when users ask AI assistants about Specialty Telehealth Clinics. Only 4 brands in this category scored above 40. Categories often land here for two reasons: the space is dominated by local or niche players no single AI model has strong training on, or it's a services-heavy category (agencies, consultants) where AI assistants tend not to name specific brands regardless of reputation.

Brand Leaderboard All 39 Specialty Telehealth Clinics brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Teladoc
teladoc.com
 75
20
75
49
2
Hims
hims.com
 76
16
79
47
3
Nurx
nurx.com
 79
15
61
43
4
Amwell
amwell.com
 67
17
59
42
5
Ro
ro.co
 75
13
50
38
6
Apostrophe
apostrophe.com
 71
7
69
36
7
Curology
curology.com
 79
8
59
36
8
Teladoc Health
teladochealth.com
 72
8
52
34
9
Maven Clinic
mavenclinic.com
 77
8
50
33
10
Talkspace
talkspace.com
 76
8
45
32
11
BetterHelp
betterhelp.com
 78
8
39
31
12
Roman
getroman.com
 77
8
29
28
13
MDLIVE
mdlive.com
 75
7
29
27
14
PlushCare
plushcare.com
 65
7
32
27
15
Sesame
sesamecare.com
 63
11
26
27
16
Calibrate
joincalibrate.com
 54
5
34
24
17
Talkiatry
talkiatry.com
 55
6
30
23
18
Found
joinfound.com
 42
4
39
22
19
MIDI Health
joinmidi.com
 57
6
22
21
20
Brightside Health
brightside.com
 58
6
19
20
21
K Health
khealth.com
 56
6
20
20
22
Wisp
hellowisp.com
 61
6
17
20
23
Cerebral
cerebral.com
 62
6
12
18
24
Hinge Health
hingehealth.com
 75
7
7
18
25
Sword Health
swordhealth.com
 74
7
7
18
26
Virta Health
virtahealth.com
 73
7
7
18
27
Numan
numan.com
 66
7
7
16
28
Plume
getplume.co
 66
7
7
16
29
Bicycle Health
bicyclehealth.com
 58
6
6
15
30
Charlie Health
charliehealth.com
 60
6
6
15
31
FOLX Health
folxhealth.com
 62
6
6
15
32
Dermatica
dermatica.com
 58
6
6
14
33
Kindbody
kindbody.com
 56
6
6
14
34
Rula
rula.com
 54
5
5
14
35
Manual
manual.co
 51
5
5
13
36
Oshi Health
oshihealth.com
 52
5
5
13
37
Equip
equip.health
 48
5
5
12
38
SkyMD
skymd.com
 33
3
4
9
39
9amHealth
9am.health
 28
3
3
8

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 299 shared Specialty Telehealth Clinics prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 299 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →