Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

SIEM Platforms

Software solutions that collect, correlate, and analyze security event data from across an enterprise to detect and investigate threats in real time.

Brands tracked: 33
Brands analyzed: 33
Last updated: 2026-04-22
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 263
Total responses: 1,330
Top Brand Overall?
Microsoft
97/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Microsoft
93

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Microsoft
100

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Microsoft
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Microsoft is the default answer in AI responses for SIEM Platforms

Microsoft and Splunk together dominate AI responses for SIEM Platforms. Both brands consistently surface unprompted, with the model treating them as the default answers for most category queries. Brands outside the top two face a structural disadvantage: users are usually given these two before the model even considers alternatives.

Brand Leaderboard All 33 SIEM Platforms brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Microsoft
microsoft.com
 93
100
100
97
2
Splunk
splunk.com
 84
82
98
88
3
Elastic
elastic.co
 87
42
79
66
4
IBM
ibm.com
 83
38
89
65
5
Google
google.com
 80
32
82
59
6
Exabeam
exabeam.com
 70
11
46
33
7
LogRhythm
logrhythm.com
 71
5
51
26
8
Sumo Logic
sumologic.com
 72
9
24
25
9
Rapid7
rapid7.com
 79
5
23
21
10
CrowdStrike
crowdstrike.com
 88
7
3
12
11
Securonix
securonix.com
 74
1
10
8
12
Palo Alto Networks
paloaltonetworks.com
 93
0
9
2
13
Devo
devo.com
 71
0
4
1
14
Fortinet
fortinet.com
 82
0
3
1
15
Graylog
graylog.org
 67
0
1
1
16
RSA NetWitness
netwitness.com
 68
0
1
1
17
Trellix
trellix.com
 54
0
0
1
18
AlienVault
att.com
 80
0
0
0
19
Blumira
blumira.com
 48
0
0
0
20
Coralogix
coralogix.com
 62
0
0
0
21
DNIF
dnif.it
 36
0
0
0
22
Gurucul
gurucul.com
 56
0
0
0
23
Hunters
hunters.security
 38
0
0
0
24
LogPoint
logpoint.com
 55
0
0
0
25
Logz.io
logz.io
 64
0
0
0
26
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
manageengine.com
 48
0
0
0
27
OpenText SMAX
opentext.com
 35
0
0
0
28
Panther
panther.com
 39
0
0
0
29
P
Prelude
prelude.security
 24
0
0
0
30
SearchInform SIEM
searchinform.com
 31
0
0
0
31
SOC Prime
socprime.com
 62
0
0
0
32
SolarWinds Web Help Desk
solarwinds.com
 32
0
0
0
33
Stellar Cyber
stellarcyber.ai
 60
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 263 shared SIEM Platforms prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 263 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →