Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Regional Taxi App Services

Locally or regionally focused apps and companies that digitize taxi booking, dispatch, and payment within specific metropolitan areas or countries.

Brands tracked: 36
Brands analyzed: 36
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 281
Total responses: 1,435
Top Brand Overall?
Uber
94/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Uber
82

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Uber
100

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Uber
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Uber is the default answer in AI responses for Regional Taxi App Services

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Regional Taxi App Services, Uber is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. Lyft is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 36 Regional Taxi App Services brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Uber
uber.com
 82
100
100
94
2
Lyft
lyft.com
 69
87
92
82
3
Bolt
bolt.eu
 64
39
90
61
4
FREE NOW
free-now.com
 63
24
85
51
5
Curb
gocurb.com
 50
48
45
47
6
Grab
grab.com
 78
13
78
43
7
O
Ola
olacabs.com
 68
8
62
32
8
DiDi
didiglobal.com
 66
2
50
20
9
Careem
careem.com
 80
2
41
17
10
inDrive
indrive.com
 62
1
14
10
11
Flywheel
flywheel.com
 51
1
1
3
12
Gojek
gojek.com
 78
0
37
3
13
Cabify
cabify.com
 68
0
19
2
14
Gett
gett.com
 57
0
15
2
15
13cabs
13cabs.com.au
 58
0
4
1
16
99
99app.com
 59
0
5
1
17
Blacklane
blacklane.com
 69
0
3
1
18
GO
goinc.jp
 11
0
3
1
19
Hailo
hailo.com
 53
0
5
1
20
Taxi.eu
taxi.eu
 31
0
1
1
21
Yango
yango.com
 46
0
6
1
22
Addison Lee
addisonlee.com
 71
0
0
0
23
Arro
goarro.com
 4
1
0
0
24
B
Beat
thebeat.co
 59
0
0
0
25
BiTaksi
bitaksi.com
 59
0
0
0
26
eCabs
ecabs.com.mt
 39
0
0
0
27
G7
g7.fr
 36
0
0
0
28
Heetch
heetch.com
 51
0
0
0
29
Hopin
hopin.com
 12
0
0
0
30
iTaxi
itaxi.pl
 41
0
0
0
31
Jugnoo
jugnoo.in
 41
0
0
0
32
LeCab
lecab.fr
 34
0
0
0
33
Meru
merucabs.com
 40
0
0
0
34
Namma Yatri
nammayatri.in
 58
0
0
0
35
Taxi Stockholm
taxistockholm.se
 53
0
0
0
36
zTrip
ztrip.com
 37
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 281 shared Regional Taxi App Services prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 281 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →