Prototyping & Handoff Platforms
Platforms that enable interactive prototyping, user testing, and developer handoff with design specs and asset export capabilities.
Figma is the default answer in AI responses for Prototyping & Handoff Platforms
When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Prototyping & Handoff Platforms, Figma is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. Framer is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.
Brand Leaderboard All 36 Prototyping & Handoff Platforms brands ranked
Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.
| # | Brand | LBA | Authority | TOM | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 Figma
figma.com
|
86 | 100 | 100 | 95 |
| 2 |
 Framer
framer.com
|
83 | 66 | 93 | 80 |
| 3 |
 ProtoPie
protopie.io
|
77 | 49 | 71 | 64 |
| 4 |
 Axure
axure.com
|
75 | 41 | 83 | 63 |
| 5 |
 Balsamiq
balsamiq.com
|
76 | 26 | 24 | 36 |
| 6 |
 Sketch
sketch.com
|
76 | 6 | 49 | 28 |
| 7 |
I
InVision
invisionwfm.com
|
73 | 4 | 39 | 23 |
| 8 |
 UXPin
uxpin.com
|
70 | 17 | 10 | 22 |
| 9 |
 Adobe
adobe.com
|
85 | 2 | 53 | 21 |
| 10 |
 Webflow
webflow.com
|
83 | 4 | 17 | 18 |
| 11 |
 Marvel
marvelapp.com
|
71 | 1 | 29 | 14 |
| 12 |
 Penpot
penpot.app
|
66 | 11 | 3 | 13 |
| 13 |
 Justinmind
justinmind.com
|
64 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 14 |
 Miro
miro.com
|
84 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| 15 |
 Zeplin
zeplin.io
|
76 | 0 | 14 | 2 |
| 16 |
 Abstract
abstract.com
|
62 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| 17 |
 Anima
animaapp.com
|
54 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 18 |
 Bubble
bubble.io
|
86 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| 19 |
 Maze
maze.co
|
56 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 20 |
P
Principle
principleformac.com
|
59 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| 21 |
 Useberry
useberry.com
|
38 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 22 |
 UserTesting
usertesting.com
|
78 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 23 |
 Avocode
avocode.com
|
56 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 |
 Flinto
flinto.com
|
56 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 |
H
HotGloo
hotgloo.com
|
34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 |
 Mockplus
mockplus.com
|
57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 |
 Moqups
moqups.com
|
54 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 |
 Origami Studio
origami.design
|
64 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 |
 Overflow
overflow.io
|
49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 |
 Pidoco
pidoco.com
|
40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 |
 Proto.io
proto.io
|
66 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 |
 Quant-UX
quant-ux.com
|
28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 |
 Supernova
supernova.io
|
31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 |
S
Sympli
sympli.io
|
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 |
 Visily
visily.ai
|
40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 |
 zeroheight
zeroheight.com
|
40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
How is this calculated? Methodology
Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 276 shared Prototyping & Handoff Platforms prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.
Overall AI Visibility Score
(LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →