Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Performance Management Platforms

Software suites that centralize goal setting, continuous feedback, performance reviews, and appraisal workflows for organizations.

Brands tracked: 36
Brands analyzed: 36
Last updated: 2026-04-22
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 271
Total responses: 1,415
Top Brand Overall?
Lattice
89/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Lattice
81

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
Lattice
89

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Lattice
100

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Lattice is the default answer in AI responses for Performance Management Platforms

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Performance Management Platforms, Lattice is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. 15Five is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 36 Performance Management Platforms brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Lattice
lattice.com
 81
89
100
89
2
15Five
15five.com
 75
71
95
79
3
Culture Amp
cultureamp.com
 81
34
82
61
4
Leapsome
leapsome.com
 74
29
69
53
5
Workday
workday.com
 71
21
65
47
6
Betterworks
betterworks.com
 67
24
52
44
7
BambooHR
bamboohr.com
 73
10
71
40
8
SAP SuccessFactors
successfactors.com
 75
7
44
32
9
Oracle
oracle.com
 78
8
14
22
10
Asana
asana.com
 77
8
8
19
11
UKG
ukg.com
 69
7
12
19
12
Rippling
rippling.com
 74
7
7
18
13
HiBob
hibob.com
 68
7
8
17
14
PerformYard
performyard.com
 41
4
21
17
15
Cornerstone OnDemand
cornerstoneondemand.com
 65
6
6
16
16
Zoho
zoho.com
 64
6
7
16
17
Quantum Workplace
quantumworkplace.com
 60
6
6
15
18
Trakstar
trakstar.com
 52
5
9
15
19
Workhuman
workhuman.com
 60
6
6
15
20
Workleap
workleap.com
 61
6
6
15
21
Notion
notion.so
 56
6
6
14
22
Profit.co
profit.co
 55
6
6
14
23
Small Improvements
small-improvements.com
 56
6
6
14
24
ClearCompany
clearcompany.com
 51
5
5
13
25
Engagedly
engagedly.com
 52
5
5
13
26
eloomi
eloomi.com
 43
4
4
11
27
Peoplebox
peoplebox.ai
 45
4
4
11
28
AssessTEAM
assessteam.com
 37
4
4
10
29
Synergita
synergita.com
 37
4
4
10
30
Primalogik
primalogik.com
 34
3
3
9
31
StaffCircle
staffcircle.com
 36
4
4
9
32
PeopleGoal
peoplegoal.com
 31
3
3
8
33
Appraisd
appraisd.com
 27
3
3
7
34
Motivii
motivii.com
 26
3
3
7
35
Mesh
mesh.ai
 18
2
2
5
36
PossibleWorks
possibleworks.com
 7
1
1
2

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 271 shared Performance Management Platforms prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 271 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →