Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Non-Alcoholic Alternatives

Beverages formulated to mimic alcoholic drinks' flavors and experience without alcohol, including non-alcoholic beers, spirits, and cocktails.

Brands tracked: 37
Brands analyzed: 37
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 287
Total responses: 1,470
Top Brand Overall?
Seedlip
68/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Athletic Brewing Company
89

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
Seedlip
43

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Seedlip
84

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Non-Alcoholic Alternatives has no dominant brand in AI responses

Seedlip is the top-ranked brand here, but its overall score of 68 reflects a competitive field rather than a dominant player. AI assistants answer category questions about Non-Alcoholic Alternatives with varied recommendations from query to query - users get a different set of suggestions each time. This is the kind of category where mid-tier brands still have room to move up.

Brand Leaderboard All 37 Non-Alcoholic Alternatives brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Seedlip
seedlipdrinks.com
 87
43
84
68
2
Ritual Zero Proof
ritualzeroproof.com
 71
36
76
58
3
Ghia
drinkghia.com
 77
31
58
52
4
Heineken 0.0
heineken.com
 79
15
46
39
5
TÖST
tostbeverages.com
 57
14
33
30
6
Guinness 0.0
guinness.com
 82
8
27
28
7
MONDAY
drinkmonday.co
 53
5
48
27
8
Clausthaler
clausthaler.com
 73
7
18
23
9
Kin Euphorics
kineuphorics.com
 68
7
21
23
10
Fever-Tree
fever-tree.com
 84
8
11
22
11
N
Noughty
noughty.com
 70
11
11
22
12
S
St. Agrestis
st-agrestis.com
 72
7
15
22
13
Three Spirit
threespiritdrinks.com
 65
6
21
22
14
Athletic Brewing Company
athleticbrewing.com
 89
9
9
21
15
Wilfred’s
drinkwilfreds.com
 51
5
25
21
16
De Soi
drinkdesoi.com
 64
6
16
20
17
Fre
frewines.com
 55
5
21
20
18
Lyre's
lyres.com
 80
8
8
19
19
Partake Brewing
partakebrewing.com
 70
7
10
19
20
Pentire
pentiredrinks.com
 62
6
11
18
21
Aplós
aplos.world
 66
7
7
16
22
CleanCo
clean.co
 66
7
7
16
23
Everleaf
everleafdrinks.com
 67
7
7
16
24
Caleño
calenodrinks.co.uk
 59
6
6
15
25
Free Spirits
drinkfreespirits.com
 41
4
15
15
26
Grüvi
getgruvi.com
 62
6
6
15
27
Bravus
bravus.com
 56
6
6
14
28
ISH
ishspirits.com
 56
6
6
14
29
Wilderton
wildertonfree.com
 56
6
6
14
30
Abstinence
abstinencespirits.com
 52
5
5
13
31
Brooklyn Brewery
brooklynbrewery.com
 44
4
4
11
32
Mingle Mocktails
minglemocktails.com
 44
4
4
11
33
F
Figlia
drinkfiglia.com
 38
4
4
10
34
Go Brewing
gobrewing.com
 35
4
4
9
35
F
Free AF
drinkfreeaf.com
 28
3
3
8
36
Surely
drinksurely.com
 31
3
3
8
37
WellBeing Brewing
wellbeingbrewing.com
 24
2
2
7

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 287 shared Non-Alcoholic Alternatives prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 287 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →