Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Motion Graphics Suites

Specialized software for creating motion graphics, visual effects, and compositing for titles, animations, and broadcast-quality visuals.

Brands tracked: 27
Brands analyzed: 27
Last updated: 2026-04-22
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 227
Total responses: 1,120
Top Brand Overall?
Adobe
91/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
DaVinci Resolve
94

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Adobe
82

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Adobe
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Adobe is the default answer in AI responses for Motion Graphics Suites

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Motion Graphics Suites, Adobe is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. DaVinci Resolve is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 27 Motion Graphics Suites brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Adobe
adobe.com
 91
82
100
91
2
DaVinci Resolve
blackmagicdesign.com
 94
58
64
70
3
Apple
apple.com
 71
39
47
50
4
Motion
usemotion.com
 55
39
43
45
5
Cinema 4D
maxon.net
 86
17
54
43
6
Blender
blender.org
 88
26
29
41
7
Cavalry
scenegroup.co
 47
10
18
20
8
Vizrt
vizrt.com
 72
0
3
4
9
Boris FX
borisfx.com
 86
0
12
2
10
Houdini
sidefx.com
 93
0
8
2
11
Chyron
chyron.com
 71
0
2
1
12
Flame
autodesk.com
 37
0
6
1
13
HitFilm
fxhome.com
 63
0
2
1
14
Notch
notch.one
 64
0
1
1
15
Nuke Studio
foundry.com
 86
0
2
1
16
Toon Boom Harmony
toonboom.com
 86
0
3
1
17
XPression
rossvideo.com
 70
0
4
1
18
Alight Motion
alightmotion.com
 68
0
0
0
19
CasparCG
casparcg.com
 51
0
0
0
20
disguise
disguise.one
 54
0
0
0
21
Natron
natron.fr
 45
0
0
0
22
Resolume
resolume.com
 84
0
0
0
23
Silhouette
silhouettefx.com
 73
0
0
0
24
TouchDesigner
derivative.ca
 88
0
0
0
25
VEGAS Pro
vegascreativesoftware.com
 67
0
0
0
26
Ventuz
ventuz.com
 60
0
0
0
27
Zero Density
zerodensity.io
 52
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 227 shared Motion Graphics Suites prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 227 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →