Industry Report

Mobile Crypto Wallets

Smartphone applications for storing, sending, receiving, and interacting with cryptocurrencies and Web3 dApps, often providing seed phrase control and integrated swap features.

Brands tracked: 37
Brands analyzed: 37
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 287
Total responses: 1,470
Top Brand Overall?
Trust Wallet
87/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Coinbase
81

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Trust Wallet
92

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Trust Wallet
98

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Trust Wallet is the default answer in AI responses for Mobile Crypto Wallets

Trust Wallet and MetaMask together dominate AI responses for Mobile Crypto Wallets. Both brands consistently surface unprompted, with the model treating them as the default answers for most category queries. Brands outside the top two face a structural disadvantage: users are usually given these two before the model even considers alternatives.

Brand Leaderboard All 37 Mobile Crypto Wallets brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 287 shared Mobile Crypto Wallets prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 287 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →