Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Mid-Market ERP Accounting Suites

Comprehensive enterprise resource planning systems with robust accounting modules that support multicompany, multicurrency, and advanced financial consolidation for mid-market firms.

Brands tracked: 31
Brands analyzed: 31
Last updated: 2026-04-22
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 251
Total responses: 1,260
Top Brand Overall?
Microsoft
84/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Microsoft
92

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Microsoft
66

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Microsoft
99

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Microsoft leads the Mid-Market ERP Accounting Suites category in AI responses

Microsoft is the most consistently-surfaced brand when users ask AI assistants about Mid-Market ERP Accounting Suites, but not to the point of monopolising the conversation. Sage Intacct and a handful of others appear regularly, giving users a reasonable set of alternatives to compare. The top of this leaderboard is where most of the AI-driven traffic will go.

Brand Leaderboard All 31 Mid-Market ERP Accounting Suites brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Microsoft
microsoft.com
 92
66
99
84
2
Sage Intacct
sageintacct.com
 82
66
78
75
3
Oracle
oracle.com
 74
65
67
69
4
Acumatica
acumatica.com
 74
38
66
57
5
SAP
sap.com
 82
24
80
54
6
Workday
workday.com
 76
1
10
9
7
SYSPRO
syspro.com
 67
0
6
2
8
Deltek Costpoint
deltek.com
 71
0
1
1
9
IFS
ifs.com
 62
0
3
1
10
Plex
plex.com
 57
0
3
1
11
QAD
qad.com
 64
0
1
1
12
abas
abas-erp.com
 69
0
0
0
13
AccountsIQ
accountsiq.com
 49
0
0
0
14
Aptean
aptean.com
 52
0
0
0
15
BatchMaster
batchmaster.com
 16
0
0
0
16
Certinia
certinia.com
 59
0
0
0
17
Epicor CPQ
epicor.com
 60
0
0
0
18
ERPNext
erpnext.com
 76
0
0
0
19
Exact Online
exact.com
 65
0
0
0
20
Infor CPQ
infor.com
 60
0
0
0
21
Macola
macola.com
 43
0
0
0
22
Multiview
multiviewcorp.com
 38
0
0
0
23
MYOB
myob.com
 67
0
0
0
24
NetSuite CRM
netsuite.com
 78
0
0
0
25
Odoo CRM
odoo.com
 80
0
0
0
26
Priority
priority-software.com
 50
0
0
0
27
Ramco
ramco.com
 45
0
0
0
28
Sage CRM
sage.com
 57
0
0
0
29
Unit4
unit4.com
 65
0
0
0
30
Visma eAccounting
visma.com
 57
0
0
0
31
Xledger
xledger.com
 47
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 251 shared Mid-Market ERP Accounting Suites prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 251 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →