Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Learning Experience Platforms

Systems designed to deliver personalized, learner-centered training experiences by aggregating content, recommendations, and analytics.

Brands tracked: 38
Brands analyzed: 38
Last updated: 2026-04-22
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 293
Total responses: 1,505
Top Brand Overall?
Degreed
81/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
LinkedIn Learning
83

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
Docebo
80

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Degreed
100

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Degreed leads the Learning Experience Platforms category in AI responses

Degreed is the most consistently-surfaced brand when users ask AI assistants about Learning Experience Platforms, but not to the point of monopolising the conversation. Docebo and a handful of others appear regularly, giving users a reasonable set of alternatives to compare. The top of this leaderboard is where most of the AI-driven traffic will go.

Brand Leaderboard All 38 Learning Experience Platforms brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Degreed
degreed.com
 73
74
100
81
2
Docebo
docebo.com
 69
80
89
79
3
360Learning
360learning.com
 74
41
60
57
4
E
EdCast
edcast.com
 65
17
67
43
5
Sana
sanalabs.com
 63
6
47
29
6
Skillsoft
skillsoft.com
 74
7
28
27
7
Learn Amp
learnamp.com
 54
5
34
24
8
LinkedIn Learning
linkedin.com
 83
8
16
24
9
Moodle
moodle.com
 79
8
18
24
10
Valamis
valamis.com
 44
4
51
24
11
Absorb LMS
absorblms.com
 77
8
17
23
12
Fuse
fuseuniversal.com
 35
4
49
22
13
SAP
sap.com
 59
6
19
21
14
Cornerstone OnDemand
cornerstoneondemand.com
 73
7
7
18
15
LearnUpon
learnupon.com
 68
7
9
18
16
TalentLMS
talentlms.com
 66
10
7
18
17
Axonify
axonify.com
 71
7
7
17
18
EdApp
edapp.com
 63
6
6
16
19
CrossKnowledge
crossknowledge.com
 59
6
6
15
20
Intellum
intellum.com
 58
6
6
15
21
WorkRamp
workramp.com
 62
6
6
15
22
Go1
go1.com
 57
6
6
14
23
Learning Pool
learningpool.com
 57
6
6
14
24
NovoEd
novoed.com
 51
5
5
13
25
Coorpacademy
coorpacademy.com
 48
5
5
12
26
Hive Learning
hivelearning.com
 47
5
5
12
27
Disprz
disprz.com
 45
4
4
11
28
eloomi
eloomi.com
 41
4
4
11
29
Area9 Lyceum
area9lyceum.com
 40
4
4
10
30
HowNow
hownow.com
 37
4
4
10
31
isEazy
iseazy.com
 38
4
4
10
32
Thrive
thrivelearning.com
 35
3
4
10
33
7taps
7taps.com
 36
4
4
9
34
Continu
continu.com
 34
3
3
9
35
Auzmor Learn
auzmor.com
 30
3
3
8
36
Arist
arist.co
 24
2
2
7
37
Rise Up
riseup.ai
 27
3
3
7
38
MobieTrain
mobietrain.com
 23
2
2
6

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 293 shared Learning Experience Platforms prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 293 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →