Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Hybrid Mattresses

Mattresses combining innerspring support coils with foam or latex comfort layers to balance responsiveness and cushioning.

Brands tracked: 32
Brands analyzed: 32
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 257
Total responses: 1,295
Top Brand Overall?
Saatva
78/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Saatva
89

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
Saatva
52

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Saatva
100

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Saatva leads the Hybrid Mattresses category in AI responses

Saatva is the most consistently-surfaced brand when users ask AI assistants about Hybrid Mattresses, but not to the point of monopolising the conversation. Helix and a handful of others appear regularly, giving users a reasonable set of alternatives to compare. The top of this leaderboard is where most of the AI-driven traffic will go.

Brand Leaderboard All 32 Hybrid Mattresses brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Saatva
saatva.com
 89
52
100
78
2
Helix
helixsleep.com
 77
52
99
73
3
Brooklyn Bedding
brooklynbedding.com
 84
39
86
66
4
DreamCloud
dreamcloudsleep.com
 74
27
87
56
5
Leesa
leesa.com
 71
16
52
40
6
Purple
purple.com
 87
9
36
32
7
Nectar
nectarhr.com
 75
13
26
31
8
Tempur-Pedic
tempurpedic.com
 79
8
39
31
9
Nolah
nolahmattress.com
 59
9
41
29
10
Avocado
avocadogreenmattress.com
 83
8
8
20
11
Beautyrest
beautyrest.com
 83
8
8
20
12
WinkBeds
winkbeds.com
 76
8
11
20
13
Casper
casper.com
 78
8
8
19
14
Stearns & Foster
stearnsandfoster.com
 77
8
8
19
15
Naturepedic
naturepedic.com
 76
8
8
18
16
Simba
simbasleep.com
 76
8
8
18
17
Emma
myemma.com
 69
7
7
17
18
Nest Bedding
nestbedding.com
 70
7
7
17
19
Serta
serta.com
 70
7
7
17
20
Sealy
sealy.com
 65
6
6
16
21
Silentnight
silentnight.co.uk
 66
7
7
16
22
Aireloom
aireloom.com
 62
6
6
15
23
Bear Mattress
bearmattress.com
 62
6
6
15
24
Kingsdown
kingsdown.com
 58
6
6
15
25
Bedgear
bedgear.com
 53
5
5
13
26
Brentwood Home
brentwoodhome.com
 52
5
5
13
27
Hypnos
hypnosbeds.com
 53
5
5
13
28
OTTY
otty.com
 51
5
5
13
29
Therapedic
therapedic.com
 46
5
5
12
30
Engineered Sleep
engineeredsleep.com
 36
4
4
10
31
REM-Fit
rem-fit.co.uk
 36
4
4
9
32
DLX Mattress
dlxmattress.com
 28
3
3
8

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 257 shared Hybrid Mattresses prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 257 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →