Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Hybrid Mattresses

Mattresses combining innerspring support coils with foam or latex comfort layers to balance responsiveness and cushioning.

Brands tracked: 32
Brands analyzed: 32
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 257
Total responses: 1,295
Top Brand Overall?
Saatva
77/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Saatva
89

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Saatva
52

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Saatva
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Saatva leads the Hybrid Mattresses category in AI responses

Saatva is the most consistently-surfaced brand when users ask AI assistants about Hybrid Mattresses, but not to the point of monopolising the conversation. Helix and a handful of others appear regularly, giving users a reasonable set of alternatives to compare. The top of this leaderboard is where most of the AI-driven traffic will go.

Brand Leaderboard All 32 Hybrid Mattresses brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Saatva
saatva.com
 89
52
100
77
2
Helix
helixsleep.com
 77
52
99
73
3
Brooklyn Bedding
brooklynbedding.com
 84
39
86
65
4
DreamCloud
dreamcloudsleep.com
 74
27
87
55
5
Leesa
leesa.com
 71
16
52
39
6
Nectar
nectarhr.com
 75
13
26
30
7
Nolah
nolahmattress.com
 59
9
41
28
8
Tempur-Pedic
tempurpedic.com
 79
2
39
19
9
WinkBeds
winkbeds.com
 76
3
11
14
10
Avocado
avocadogreenmattress.com
 83
6
5
13
11
Purple
purple.com
 87
0
36
3
12
Beautyrest
beautyrest.com
 83
0
3
1
13
Casper
casper.com
 78
0
1
1
14
Naturepedic
naturepedic.com
 76
1
0
1
15
Nest Bedding
nestbedding.com
 70
0
0
1
16
Sealy
sealy.com
 65
0
3
1
17
Stearns & Foster
stearnsandfoster.com
 77
0
0
1
18
Aireloom
aireloom.com
 62
0
0
0
19
Bear Mattress
bearmattress.com
 62
0
0
0
20
Bedgear
bedgear.com
 53
0
0
0
21
Brentwood Home
brentwoodhome.com
 52
0
0
0
22
DLX Mattress
dlxmattress.com
 28
0
0
0
23
Emma
myemma.com
 69
0
0
0
24
Engineered Sleep
engineeredsleep.com
 36
0
0
0
25
Hypnos
hypnosbeds.com
 53
0
0
0
26
Kingsdown
kingsdown.com
 58
0
0
0
27
OTTY
otty.com
 51
0
0
0
28
REM-Fit
rem-fit.co.uk
 36
0
0
0
29
Serta
serta.com
 70
0
0
0
30
Silentnight
silentnight.co.uk
 66
0
0
0
31
Simba
simbasleep.com
 76
0
0
0
32
Therapedic
therapedic.com
 46
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 257 shared Hybrid Mattresses prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 257 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →