Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

HOA and Condo Association Management Solutions

Solutions tailored to homeowners associations and condominium boards for dues collection, covenant enforcement, meeting management, and resident communication.

Brands tracked: 36
Brands analyzed: 36
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 281
Total responses: 1,435
Top Brand Overall?
Buildium
61/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Buildium
70

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
CINC Systems
54

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
CINC Systems
79

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

HOA and Condo Association Management Solutions has no dominant brand in AI responses

Buildium is the top-ranked brand here, but its overall score of 61 reflects a competitive field rather than a dominant player. AI assistants answer category questions about HOA and Condo Association Management Solutions with varied recommendations from query to query - users get a different set of suggestions each time. This is the kind of category where mid-tier brands still have room to move up.

Brand Leaderboard All 36 HOA and Condo Association Management Solutions brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Buildium
buildium.com
 70
45
72
61
2
AppFolio
appfolio.com
 65
43
68
57
3
CINC Systems
cincsystems.com
 40
54
79
56
4
Condo Control
condocontrol.com
 48
27
57
42
5
Vantaca
vantaca.com
 40
26
68
42
6
PayHOA
payhoa.com
 34
36
37
36
7
FRONTSTEPS
frontsteps.com
 42
8
21
20
8
TOPS [ONE]
topsone.com
 26
3
36
17
9
TownSq
townsq.io
 43
4
17
17
10
E
Enumerate
enumerate.com
 33
3
26
16
11
Wild Apricot
wildapricot.com
 41
4
16
16
12
MemberClicks
memberclicks.com
 36
4
18
15
13
Yardi Voyager
yardi.com
 55
6
6
14
14
DoorLoop
doorloop.com
 44
4
9
13
15
Caliber
calibersoftware.com
 31
5
3
9
16
TOPS Software
topssoft.com
 34
3
3
9
17
CiraConnect
ciraconnect.com
 31
3
3
8
18
Stripe Billing
stripe.com
 27
3
3
7
19
HOA Express
hoa-express.com
 12
1
9
6
20
Nabr Network
nabrnetwork.com
 18
2
2
5
21
Smartwebs
smartwebs.com
 15
1
2
5
22
eUnify
eunify.net
 5
1
1
2
23
HOA Messenger
hoamessenger.com
 7
1
1
2
24
HOA Start
hoastart.com
 0
0
11
2
25
Pilera
pilera.com
 7
1
1
2
26
Community Boss
communityboss.com
 3
0
0
1
27
Community Financials
communityfinancials.com
 4
0
0
1
28
CondoCommunities
condocommunities.com
 4
0
0
1
29
CondoVoter
condovoter.com
 2
0
0
1
30
CondoWorks
condoworks.co
 4
0
0
1
31
myCondoBooks
mycondobooks.com
 4
0
0
1
32
Bazinga
bazinga.com
 0
0
0
0
33
C
Condo Cafe
condocafe.com
 0
0
0
0
34
SenEarthCo
senearthco.com
 0
0
0
0
35
Stratastic
stratastic.com
 0
0
0
0
36
Vinteum
vinteum.io
 0
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 281 shared HOA and Condo Association Management Solutions prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 281 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →