Feature Flag Services
Services that enable progressive feature rollout, A/B testing, and runtime toggling of application functionality for teams.
LaunchDarkly is the default answer in AI responses for Feature Flag Services
When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Feature Flag Services, LaunchDarkly is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. ConfigCat is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.
Brand Leaderboard All 32 Feature Flag Services brands ranked
Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.
| # | Brand | LBA | Authority | TOM | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 LaunchDarkly
launchdarkly.com
|
89 | 100 | 100 | 96 |
| 2 |
 ConfigCat
configcat.com
|
70 | 62 | 86 | 72 |
| 3 |
 Unleash
getunleash.io
|
76 | 55 | 82 | 70 |
| 4 |
 Flagsmith
flagsmith.com
|
77 | 51 | 75 | 67 |
| 5 |
 Split
split.io
|
73 | 33 | 90 | 61 |
| 6 |
 Statsig
statsig.com
|
73 | 22 | 32 | 38 |
| 7 |
 Optimizely
optimizely.com
|
80 | 8 | 23 | 26 |
| 8 |
 CloudBees
cloudbees.com
|
58 | 6 | 18 | 20 |
| 9 |
 Harness
harness.io
|
78 | 8 | 8 | 19 |
| 10 |
 PostHog
posthog.com
|
77 | 8 | 8 | 19 |
| 11 |
 GrowthBook
growthbook.io
|
74 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 12 |
 VWO
vwo.com
|
71 | 7 | 7 | 17 |
| 13 |
 AB Tasty
abtasty.com
|
59 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 14 |
 Apptimize
apptimize.com
|
59 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 15 |
 Amplitude
amplitude.com
|
56 | 6 | 6 | 14 |
| 16 |
 DevCycle
devcycle.com
|
53 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 17 |
 GitHub
github.com
|
53 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 18 |
 Kameleoon
kameleoon.com
|
50 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 19 |
T
Taplytics
taplytics.com
|
53 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 20 |
 Eppo
eppo.io
|
49 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 21 |
 Leanplum
leanplum.com
|
46 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 22 |
 Bullet Train
bullettrain.co
|
40 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 23 |
 Flipt
flipt.io
|
35 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 24 |
 GO Feature Flag
gofeatureflag.org
|
35 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 25 |
 Qonversion
qonversion.io
|
32 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 26 |
 Airship
airship.com
|
23 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 |
 Prefab
prefab.cloud
|
26 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 28 |
 Tggl
tggl.io
|
25 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 29 |
 FeatBit
featbit.co
|
12 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 30 |
 Hypertune
hypertune.com
|
11 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 31 |
 Flagship
flagship.io
|
7 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 32 |
 Bucketeer
bucketeer.io
|
4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
How is this calculated? Methodology
Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 257 shared Feature Flag Services prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.
Overall AI Visibility Score
composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →