Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Dryers

Household tumble or condenser appliances that remove moisture from washed clothes using gas or electric heating and a range of sensor and cycle features from prominent brands.

Brands tracked: 34
Brands analyzed: 34
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 269
Total responses: 1,365
Top Brand Overall?
LG
85/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Samsung
88

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
LG
76

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
LG
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

LG is the default answer in AI responses for Dryers

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Dryers, LG is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. Whirlpool is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 34 Dryers brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
LG
lg.com
 81
76
100
85
2
Whirlpool
whirlpool.com
 71
50
82
66
3
GE
ge.com
 77
38
52
53
4
Maytag
maytag.com
 72
25
71
50
5
Samsung
samsung.com
 88
20
53
46
6
Bosch
bosch-home.com
 74
17
56
41
7
Miele
miele.com
 84
18
42
40
8
Speed Queen
speedqueen.com
 73
13
65
39
9
Electrolux
electrolux.com
 68
11
50
34
10
Amana
amana.com
 63
4
0
5
11
Hotpoint
hotpoint.com
 59
2
0
3
12
GE Appliances
geappliances.com
 68
0
10
2
13
Lowe’s
lowes.com
 52
8
0
2
14
AEG
aeg.com
 66
0
3
1
15
Asko
asko.com
 61
0
0
1
16
Beko
beko.com
 59
0
1
1
17
Frigidaire
frigidaire.com
 67
0
2
1
18
Siemens
siemens-home.bsh-group.com
 77
0
2
1
19
Bauknecht
bauknecht.de
 49
0
0
0
20
Blomberg
blombergappliances.com
 45
0
0
0
21
Candy
candy-home.com
 53
0
0
0
22
Fisher & Paykel
fisherpaykel.com
 67
0
0
0
23
Gorenje
gorenje.com
 56
0
0
0
24
Grundig
grundig.com
 46
0
0
0
25
Haier
haier.com
 60
0
0
0
26
H
Hisense
hisense.com
 56
0
0
0
27
Home Depot
homedepot.com
 75
0
0
0
28
Hoover
hoover-home.com
 44
0
0
0
29
Indesit
indesit.com
 52
0
0
0
30
Kenmore
kenmore.com
 67
0
0
0
31
NEFF
neff-home.com
 33
0
0
0
32
S
SMEG
smeg.com
 44
0
0
0
33
White Knight
whiteknight.co.uk
 43
0
0
0
34
Zanussi
zanussi.com
 62
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 269 shared Dryers prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 269 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →