Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Dining Table Brands

Manufacturers and retailers specializing in dining tables and accompanying dining sets made from wood, metal, glass, and composite materials for home dining spaces.

Brands tracked: 43
Brands analyzed: 43
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 323
Total responses: 1,680
Top Brand Overall?
IKEA
72/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
IKEA
86

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
IKEA
72

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Room & Board
96

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

IKEA leads the Dining Table Brands category in AI responses

IKEA is the most consistently-surfaced brand when users ask AI assistants about Dining Table Brands, but not to the point of monopolising the conversation. West Elm and a handful of others appear regularly, giving users a reasonable set of alternatives to compare. The top of this leaderboard is where most of the AI-driven traffic will go.

Brand Leaderboard All 43 Dining Table Brands brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
IKEA
ikea.com
 86
72
59
72
2
West Elm
westelm.com
 79
41
92
67
3
Room & Board
roomandboard.com
 85
18
96
55
4
Crate & Barrel
crateandbarrel.com
 76
21
86
53
5
Article
article.com
 66
24
79
50
6
CB2
cb2.com
 74
7
47
32
7
Pottery Barn
potterybarn.com
 73
7
47
32
8
Wayfair
wayfair.com
 63
19
11
25
9
Blu Dot
bludot.com
 73
7
15
22
10
Ethan Allen
ethanallen.com
 71
7
17
22
11
Arhaus
arhaus.com
 70
7
14
21
12
HAY
hay.com
 80
8
9
20
13
Stickley
stickley.com
 83
8
8
20
14
RH (Restoration Hardware)
rh.com
 80
8
8
19
15
Cattelan Italia
cattelanitalia.com
 73
7
7
18
16
Lulu and Georgia
luluandgeorgia.com
 58
6
13
18
17
Bassett Furniture
bassettfurniture.com
 69
7
7
17
18
Bernhardt
bernhardt.com
 71
7
7
17
19
Calligaris
calligaris.com
 67
7
7
17
20
Ethnicraft
ethnicraft.com
 70
7
7
17
21
Target
target.com
 68
7
7
17
22
Ashley Furniture
ashleyfurniture.com
 64
6
6
16
23
Bontempi Casa
bontempi.it
 67
7
7
16
24
Copeland Furniture
copelandfurniture.com
 65
6
6
16
25
Ercol
ercol.com
 67
7
7
16
26
Hooker Furnishings
hookerfurniture.com
 59
6
6
15
27
Oak Furnitureland
oakfurnitureland.co.uk
 62
6
6
15
28
Ozzio Italia
ozzio.com
 62
6
6
15
29
Skovby
skovby.com
 62
6
6
15
30
The Cotswold Company
cotswoldco.com
 58
6
6
15
31
Canadel
canadel.com
 57
6
6
14
32
Castlery
castlery.com
 57
6
6
14
33
ALF Italia
alfitalia.com
 53
5
5
13
34
Connubia
connubia.com
 53
5
5
13
35
Danetti
danetti.com
 52
5
5
13
36
A-America
a-america.com
 47
5
5
12
37
John Boos
johnboos.com
 48
5
5
12
38
L
Liberty Furniture
libertyfurniture.com
 48
5
5
12
39
Steve Silver
stevesilver.com
 47
5
5
12
40
I
International Concepts
internationalconcepts.biz
 39
4
4
10
41
Jofran
jofran.com
 40
4
4
10
42
Furniturebox
furniturebox.co.uk
 32
3
3
9
43
Winners Only
winnersonly.com
 34
3
3
9

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 323 shared Dining Table Brands prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 323 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →