Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Dining Table Brands

Manufacturers and retailers specializing in dining tables and accompanying dining sets made from wood, metal, glass, and composite materials for home dining spaces.

Brands tracked: 43
Brands analyzed: 43
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 323
Total responses: 1,680
Top Brand Overall?
IKEA
72/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
IKEA
86

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
IKEA
72

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Room & Board
96

Highest score on the TOM metric.

IKEA leads the Dining Table Brands category in AI responses

IKEA is the most consistently-surfaced brand when users ask AI assistants about Dining Table Brands, but not to the point of monopolising the conversation. West Elm and a handful of others appear regularly, giving users a reasonable set of alternatives to compare. The top of this leaderboard is where most of the AI-driven traffic will go.

Brand Leaderboard All 43 Dining Table Brands brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
IKEA
ikea.com
 86
72
59
72
2
West Elm
westelm.com
 79
41
92
66
3
Room & Board
roomandboard.com
 85
18
96
53
4
Crate & Barrel
crateandbarrel.com
 76
21
86
52
5
Article
article.com
 66
24
79
50
6
CB2
cb2.com
 74
4
47
24
7
Pottery Barn
potterybarn.com
 73
4
47
24
8
Wayfair
wayfair.com
 63
17
8
21
9
Target
target.com
 68
6
3
10
10
Ashley Furniture
ashleyfurniture.com
 64
3
5
9
11
Arhaus
arhaus.com
 70
0
14
2
12
Bernhardt
bernhardt.com
 71
0
5
2
13
Blu Dot
bludot.com
 73
0
15
2
14
Ethan Allen
ethanallen.com
 71
0
17
2
15
HAY
hay.com
 80
0
9
2
16
Lulu and Georgia
luluandgeorgia.com
 58
0
13
2
17
RH (Restoration Hardware)
rh.com
 80
0
6
2
18
Stickley
stickley.com
 83
0
5
2
19
Bassett Furniture
bassettfurniture.com
 69
0
2
1
20
Bontempi Casa
bontempi.it
 67
0
1
1
21
Calligaris
calligaris.com
 67
0
2
1
22
Castlery
castlery.com
 57
0
2
1
23
Cattelan Italia
cattelanitalia.com
 73
0
1
1
24
Copeland Furniture
copelandfurniture.com
 65
0
2
1
25
Ethnicraft
ethnicraft.com
 70
0
4
1
26
Skovby
skovby.com
 62
0
1
1
27
A-America
a-america.com
 47
0
0
0
28
ALF Italia
alfitalia.com
 53
0
0
0
29
Canadel
canadel.com
 57
0
0
0
30
Connubia
connubia.com
 53
0
0
0
31
Danetti
danetti.com
 52
0
0
0
32
Ercol
ercol.com
 67
0
0
0
33
Furniturebox
furniturebox.co.uk
 32
0
0
0
34
Hooker Furnishings
hookerfurniture.com
 59
0
0
0
35
I
International Concepts
internationalconcepts.biz
 39
0
0
0
36
Jofran
jofran.com
 40
0
0
0
37
John Boos
johnboos.com
 48
0
0
0
38
L
Liberty Furniture
libertyfurniture.com
 48
0
0
0
39
Oak Furnitureland
oakfurnitureland.co.uk
 62
0
0
0
40
Ozzio Italia
ozzio.com
 62
0
0
0
41
Steve Silver
stevesilver.com
 47
0
0
0
42
The Cotswold Company
cotswoldco.com
 58
0
0
0
43
Winners Only
winnersonly.com
 34
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 323 shared Dining Table Brands prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 323 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →