Data Visualization Software
Specialized tools focused on creating advanced visual representations of data, interactive charts, and dashboards to help users interpret complex datasets.
Microsoft is the default answer in AI responses for Data Visualization Software
Microsoft and Power BI together dominate AI responses for Data Visualization Software. Both brands consistently surface unprompted, with the model treating them as the default answers for most category queries. Brands outside the top two face a structural disadvantage: users are usually given these two before the model even considers alternatives.
Brand Leaderboard All 34 Data Visualization Software brands ranked
Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.
| # | Brand | LBA | Authority | TOM | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 Microsoft
microsoft.com
|
92 | 97 | 100 | 96 |
| 2 |
 Power BI
powerbi.com
|
94 | 95 | 100 | 96 |
| 3 |
 Tableau
tableau.com
|
84 | 86 | 100 | 90 |
| 4 |
 Looker
looker.com
|
84 | 81 | 87 | 84 |
| 5 |
 Qlik
qlik.com
|
81 | 15 | 78 | 47 |
| 6 |
 Metabase
metabase.com
|
85 | 17 | 24 | 33 |
| 7 |
 Grafana
grafana.com
|
84 | 8 | 34 | 31 |
| 8 |
 Plotly
plotly.com
|
86 | 9 | 30 | 30 |
| 9 |
 Google
google.com
|
97 | 19 | 10 | 28 |
| 10 |
 Domo
domo.com
|
75 | 7 | 24 | 26 |
| 11 |
 Sigma Computing
sigmacomputing.com
|
70 | 7 | 24 | 25 |
| 12 |
 Sisense
sisense.com
|
67 | 7 | 24 | 24 |
| 13 |
 Highcharts
highcharts.com
|
92 | 9 | 9 | 22 |
| 14 |
 ThoughtSpot
thoughtspot.com
|
73 | 7 | 14 | 22 |
| 15 |
 Spotfire
tibco.com
|
86 | 9 | 9 | 21 |
| 16 |
 Zoho
zoho.com
|
75 | 7 | 12 | 21 |
| 17 |
 amCharts
amcharts.com
|
76 | 8 | 8 | 19 |
| 18 |
 AnyChart
anychart.com
|
73 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 19 |
 CARTO
carto.com
|
76 | 8 | 8 | 18 |
| 20 |
 Databox
databox.com
|
75 | 8 | 8 | 18 |
| 21 |
 Datawrapper
datawrapper.de
|
72 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 22 |
 FusionCharts
fusioncharts.com
|
72 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 23 |
 Geckoboard
geckoboard.com
|
72 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 24 |
 Infogram
infogram.com
|
74 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 25 |
 Observable
observablehq.com
|
73 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 26 |
 Yellowfin
yellowfinbi.com
|
75 | 8 | 8 | 18 |
| 27 |
 Flourish
flourish.studio
|
63 | 6 | 9 | 17 |
| 28 |
 Klipfolio
klipfolio.com
|
70 | 7 | 7 | 17 |
| 29 |
 GoodData
gooddata.com
|
65 | 7 | 7 | 16 |
| 30 |
 Redash
redash.io
|
64 | 6 | 6 | 16 |
| 31 |
 Mode
mode.com
|
59 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 32 |
 Holistics
holistics.io
|
57 | 6 | 6 | 14 |
| 33 |
 Toucan Toco
toucantoco.com
|
44 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 34 |
 ChartBlocks
chartblocks.com
|
32 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
How is this calculated? Methodology
Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 264 shared Data Visualization Software prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.
Overall AI Visibility Score
composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →