Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

CPQ Solutions

Configure-price-quote systems that help sales teams create accurate quotes, manage product/pricing rules, generate proposals, and integrate with billing and CRM systems.

Brands tracked: 32
Brands analyzed: 32
Last updated: 2026-04-22
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 257
Total responses: 1,295
Top Brand Overall?
Salesforce
96/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Salesforce
89

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Salesforce
99

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Salesforce
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Salesforce is the default answer in AI responses for CPQ Solutions

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about CPQ Solutions, Salesforce is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. Oracle is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 32 CPQ Solutions brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Salesforce
salesforce.com
 89
99
100
96
2
Oracle
oracle.com
 76
50
86
69
3
Conga
conga.com
 72
49
86
67
4
DealHub
dealhub.io
 65
51
80
64
5
SAP
sap.com
 76
26
71
52
6
PROS
pros.com
 74
15
51
38
7
Tacton
tacton.com
 66
20
40
37
8
PandaDoc
pandadoc.com
 74
11
16
24
9
Configure One
configureone.com
 57
6
17
18
10
HubSpot
hubspot.com
 72
4
21
18
11
Experlogix
experlogix.com
 52
5
13
15
12
Zoho
zoho.com
 55
4
5
11
13
Zuora
zuora.com
 67
3
8
11
14
Cincom CPQ
cincom.com
 47
0
10
2
15
Logik.io
logik.io
 52
0
7
2
16
Epicor CPQ
epicor.com
 63
0
1
1
17
Proposify
proposify.com
 65
0
1
1
18
Quoter
quoter.com
 34
0
1
1
19
QuoteWerks
quotewerks.com
 63
1
0
1
20
Vendavo
vendavo.com
 61
0
1
1
21
Verenia
verenia.com
 26
0
1
1
22
Bit2win
bit2win.com
 25
0
0
0
23
Elfsquad
elfsquad.io
 36
0
0
0
24
encoway
encoway.de
 36
0
0
0
25
eRep
erep.com
 0
0
0
0
26
GleanQuote
gleanquote.com
 0
0
0
0
27
Infor CPQ
infor.com
 52
0
0
0
28
Nue
nue.io
 13
0
0
0
29
Scaura
scaura.com
 0
0
0
0
30
S
SpeedMax
speedmax.ai
 0
0
0
0
31
Subskribe
subskribe.com
 30
0
0
0
32
XaitCPQ
xait.com
 39
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 257 shared CPQ Solutions prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 257 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →