Industry Report

Corporate LMS Platforms

Enterprise-grade learning management systems focused on employee training, compliance tracking, and organizational learning administration.

Brands tracked: 37
Brands analyzed: 37
Last updated: 2026-04-22
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 287
Total responses: 1,470
Top Brand Overall?
Docebo
87/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
LearnWorlds
79

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
Docebo
89

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Docebo
100

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Docebo is the default answer in AI responses for Corporate LMS Platforms

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Corporate LMS Platforms, Docebo is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. TalentLMS is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 37 Corporate LMS Platforms brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 287 shared Corporate LMS Platforms prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 287 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →