Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Console Subscription Services

Monthly or annual subscription programs for gaming consoles that provide access to game libraries, online multiplayer, and member discounts.

Brands tracked: 19
Brands analyzed: 19
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 179
Total responses: 840
Top Brand Overall?
PlayStation Store
5/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Google
93

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
PlayStation Store
2

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Amazon
5

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Console Subscription Services is an emerging or highly fragmented category

No brand in Console Subscription Services scored above 40 on overall AI visibility. That means AI assistants do not currently recommend specific brands for this category with any consistency. Either the category is too new or too regional for the models to have converged on a default set of answers, or the queries users ask don't lend themselves to brand-specific responses.

Brand Leaderboard All 19 Console Subscription Services brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
PlayStation Store
playstation.com
 73
2
1
5
2
Amazon
amazon.com
 88
0
5
2
3
Apple
apple.com
 61
0
2
1
4
Nintendo eShop
nintendo.com
 63
0
1
1
5
Antstream Arcade
antstream.com
 51
0
0
0
6
A
ArcadeNet
arcadenet.com
 0
0
0
0
7
Atari VCS Vault
atari.com
 25
0
0
0
8
Blacknut
blacknut.com
 49
0
0
0
9
EA app
ea.com
 48
0
0
0
10
ESO Plus
elderscrollsonline.com
 91
0
0
0
11
Fallout 1st
bethesda.net
 81
0
0
0
12
Fortnite Crew
fortnite.com
 85
0
0
0
13
GameFly
gamefly.com
 65
0
0
0
14
GeForce NOW
geforcenow.com
 75
0
0
0
15
Google
google.com
 93
0
0
0
16
GTA+
rockstargames.com
 69
0
0
0
17
SEGA Channel
sega.com
 50
0
0
0
18
Ubisoft Store
ubisoft.com
 49
0
0
0
19
Xbox Store
xbox.com
 75
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 179 shared Console Subscription Services prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 179 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →