Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Compliance Training Providers

Platforms and vendors specializing in mandatory regulatory and policy training for workplace compliance, certifications, and reporting.

Brands tracked: 38
Brands analyzed: 38
Last updated: 2026-04-22
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 288
Total responses: 1,495
Top Brand Overall?
NAVEX
67/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
KnowBe4
90

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
NAVEX
42

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
NAVEX
100

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Compliance Training Providers has no dominant brand in AI responses

NAVEX is the top-ranked brand here, but its overall score of 67 reflects a competitive field rather than a dominant player. AI assistants answer category questions about Compliance Training Providers with varied recommendations from query to query - users get a different set of suggestions each time. This is the kind of category where mid-tier brands still have room to move up.

Brand Leaderboard All 38 Compliance Training Providers brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
NAVEX
navex.com
 69
42
100
67
2
Skillsoft
skillsoft.com
 71
31
96
60
3
Traliant
traliant.com
 58
36
90
58
4
SAP Litmos
litmos.com
 69
28
37
42
5
Cornerstone OnDemand
cornerstoneondemand.com
 72
9
39
31
6
Absorb LMS
absorblms.com
 78
11
20
27
7
360Learning
360learning.com
 63
6
31
25
8
TalentLMS
talentlms.com
 68
26
7
25
9
E
Ethena
ethena.com
 42
6
46
24
10
SAI360
sai360.com
 51
5
39
24
11
Docebo
docebo.com
 71
20
7
23
12
360training
360training.com
 56
6
21
21
13
KnowBe4
knowbe4.com
 90
9
9
21
14
iHASCO
ihasco.co.uk
 52
5
18
19
15
Relias
relias.com
 72
7
7
18
16
HealthStream
healthstream.com
 71
7
7
17
17
EVERFI
everfi.com
 66
7
7
16
18
iSpring Learn
ispringsolutions.com
 65
7
7
16
19
Vector Solutions
vectorsolutions.com
 57
6
9
16
20
EasyLlama
easyllama.com
 59
6
6
15
21
Learning Pool
learningpool.com
 62
6
6
15
22
ComplianceWire
compliancewire.com
 56
6
6
14
23
HSI
hsi.com
 36
4
11
13
24
KPA
kpa.io
 40
4
10
13
25
Skillcast
skillcast.com
 46
5
5
12
26
MedTrainer
medtrainer.com
 43
4
4
11
27
Syntrio
syntrio.com
 41
4
4
11
28
Emtrain
emtrain.com
 39
4
4
10
29
VinciWorks
vinciworks.com
 39
4
4
10
30
Kantola
kantola.com
 33
3
3
9
31
D
DeltaNet International
deltanetinternational.com
 29
3
3
8
32
Me Learning
melearning.co.uk
 30
3
3
8
33
L
LawRoom
lawroom.com
 27
3
3
7
34
Sentrient
sentrient.com.au
 24
2
2
7
35
GRC Solutions
grcsolutions.com.au
 18
2
2
5
36
Media Partners
media-partners.com
 9
1
1
3
37
Interactive Services
interactive-services.com
 2
0
0
1
38
TrainingToday
blr.com
 1
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 288 shared Compliance Training Providers prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 288 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →