Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Cloud Gaming Platforms

Services that stream playable games from remote servers to devices over the internet, removing the need for high-end local hardware.

Brands tracked: 32
Brands analyzed: 32
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 257
Total responses: 1,295
Top Brand Overall?
GeForce NOW
93/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
NVIDIA
93

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
GeForce NOW
100

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
GeForce NOW
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

GeForce NOW is the default answer in AI responses for Cloud Gaming Platforms

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Cloud Gaming Platforms, GeForce NOW is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. NVIDIA is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 32 Cloud Gaming Platforms brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
GeForce NOW
geforcenow.com
 79
100
100
93
2
NVIDIA
nvidia.com
 93
46
99
75
3
Amazon
amazon.com
 76
51
84
69
4
Boosteroid
boosteroid.com
 52
41
82
56
5
Shadow
shadow.tech
 69
13
35
32
6
airgpu
airgpu.com
 32
0
1
1
7
Blacknut
blacknut.com
 58
0
1
1
8
Google
google.com
 83
0
0
1
9
Maximum Settings
maximumsettings.com
 20
0
1
1
10
Steam
steampowered.com
 89
0
2
1
11
Antstream Arcade
antstream.com
 53
0
0
0
12
G-cluster
gcluster.com
 30
0
0
0
13
G
Gaikai
gaikai.com
 60
0
0
0
14
GAME+
gameplus.com.tr
 8
0
0
0
15
JioGamesCloud
jiogames.com
 34
0
0
0
16
LiquidSky
liquidsky.com
 25
0
0
0
17
Loudplay
loudplay.io
 24
0
0
0
18
NetBoom
netboom.com
 35
0
0
0
19
Nware
nware.com
 12
0
0
0
20
OnePlay
oneplay.in
 11
0
0
0
21
O
OnLive
onlive.com
 54
0
0
0
22
Paperspace
paperspace.com
 55
0
0
0
23
Parsec
parsec.app
 77
0
0
0
24
Playkey
playkey.net
 24
0
0
0
25
PlayStation Store
playstation.com
 58
0
0
0
26
QQ Music
qq.com
 9
0
0
0
27
Rainway
rainway.com
 34
0
0
0
28
S
Sora Stream
sorastream.jp
 0
0
0
0
29
Ubitus
ubitus.net
 42
0
0
0
30
Utomik Cloud
utomik.com
 23
0
0
0
31
V
Vortex
vortex.gg
 48
0
0
0
32
Xbox Store
xbox.com
 60
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 257 shared Cloud Gaming Platforms prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 257 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →