Enterprise-grade systems that handle complex billing models, pricing catalogs, revenue assurance, and financial reporting for large organizations.
Stripe Billing is the most consistently-surfaced brand when users ask AI assistants about Billing & Revenue Management, but not to the point of monopolising the conversation. Zuora and a handful of others appear regularly, giving users a reasonable set of alternatives to compare. The top of this leaderboard is where most of the AI-driven traffic will go.
Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.
| # | Brand | LBA | Authority | TOM | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Stripe Billing
stripe.com
|
90 | 55 | 77 | 73 |
| 2 |
Zuora
zuora.com
|
71 | 47 | 91 | 68 |
| 3 |
Chargebee
chargebee.com
|
86 | 40 | 80 | 65 |
| 4 |
Recurly
recurly.com
|
74 | 14 | 55 | 40 |
| 5 |
Oracle
oracle.com
|
81 | 12 | 54 | 39 |
| 6 |
SAP
sap.com
|
76 | 8 | 51 | 34 |
| 7 |
NetSuite CRM
netsuite.com
|
68 | 11 | 42 | 33 |
| 8 |
Maxio
maxio.com
|
66 | 8 | 51 | 32 |
| 9 |
Salesforce
salesforce.com
|
81 | 8 | 20 | 26 |
| 10 |
Paddle
paddle.com
|
75 | 7 | 19 | 24 |
| 11 |
Sage Intacct
sageintacct.com
|
75 | 8 | 19 | 24 |
| 12 |
Amdocs
amdocs.com
|
76 | 9 | 13 | 23 |
| 13 |
Xero
xero.com
|
67 | 7 | 7 | 17 |
| 14 |
Aria Systems
ariasystems.com
|
64 | 6 | 6 | 16 |
| 15 |
BillingPlatform
billingplatform.com
|
61 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 16 |
Conga
conga.com
|
59 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 17 |
Lago
lago.com
|
61 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 18 |
Metronome
metronome.com
|
60 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 19 |
Netcracker
netcracker.com
|
62 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 20 |
Cerillion
cerillion.com
|
54 | 5 | 5 | 14 |
| 21 |
ChargeOver
chargeover.com
|
55 | 6 | 6 | 14 |
| 22 |
CSG
csgi.com
|
57 | 6 | 6 | 14 |
| 23 |
Orb
orb.com
|
42 | 10 | 5 | 14 |
| 24 |
Vindicia
vindicia.com
|
56 | 6 | 6 | 14 |
| 25 |
Gotransverse
gotransverse.com
|
54 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 26 |
Optiva
optiva.com
|
48 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 27 |
Amberflo
amberflo.io
|
43 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 28 |
Billsby
billsby.com
|
41 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 29 |
OneBill
onebillsoftware.com
|
44 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 30 |
billwerk
billwerk.plus
|
38 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 31 |
BluLogix
blulogix.com
|
37 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 32 |
m3ter
m3ter.com
|
37 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 33 |
Younium
younium.com
|
38 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 34 |
JustOn
juston.com
|
33 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 35 |
Ordway
ordwaylabs.com
|
33 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 36 |
Subskribe
subskribe.com
|
32 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 37 |
LogiSense
logisense.com
|
23 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 38 |
Sequence
sequencehq.com
|
23 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 39 |
EzyPay
ezypay.com
|
2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 40 |
MonetizeNow
monetizenow.io
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 305 shared Billing & Revenue Management prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.
composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →