Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

Activity Trackers

Wrist-worn or clip-on devices focused on tracking steps, sleep, calories burned, and basic health metrics for everyday fitness monitoring.

Brands tracked: 33
Brands analyzed: 33
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 258
Total responses: 1,320
Top Brand Overall?
Fitbit
91/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Apple
100

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Fitbit
95

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Fitbit
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Fitbit is the default answer in AI responses for Activity Trackers

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about Activity Trackers, Fitbit is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. Garmin is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 33 Activity Trackers brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Fitbit
fitbit.com
 80
95
100
91
2
Garmin
garmin.com
 75
51
92
71
3
Apple
apple.com
 100
39
54
60
4
Xiaomi
xiaomi.com
 74
43
46
53
5
Samsung
samsung.com
 86
34
44
50
6
Amazfit
amazfit.com
 68
36
48
49
7
Whoop
whoop.com
 81
10
35
30
8
Oura
ouraring.com
 76
7
10
18
9
Huawei
huawei.com
 69
2
20
14
10
Withings
withings.com
 72
0
5
2
11
Polar
polar.com
 80
0
3
1
12
Suunto
suunto.com
 70
0
0
1
13
Actxa
actxa.com
 24
0
0
0
14
Bellabeat
bellabeat.com
 63
0
0
0
15
boAt
boat-lifestyle.com
 63
0
0
0
16
COROS
coros.com
 73
0
0
0
17
C
Cubitt
cubitt.com
 25
0
0
0
18
Fastrack
fastrack.in
 63
0
0
0
19
GOQii
goqii.com
 57
0
0
0
20
Healbe
healbe.com
 43
0
0
0
21
HONOR
honor.com
 59
0
0
0
22
iTouch
itouchwearables.com
 30
0
0
0
23
Jawbone
jawbone.com
 60
0
0
0
24
Mio
mioglobal.com
 63
0
0
0
25
Misfit
misfit.com
 59
0
0
0
26
Moov
moov.cc
 58
0
0
0
27
Noise
gonoise.com
 66
0
0
0
28
OnePlus
oneplus.com
 47
0
0
0
29
OPPO
oppo.com
 43
0
0
0
30
realme
realme.com
 57
0
0
0
31
Sigma Sport
sigmasport.com
 47
0
0
0
32
S
Striiv
striiv.com
 29
0
0
0
33
TomTom
tomtom.com
 64
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 258 shared Activity Trackers prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 258 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →