Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles

Hybrid devices that function as both tablets and laptops with detachable keyboards or 360-degree hinges for flexible use.

Brands tracked: 23
Brands analyzed: 23
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 197
Total responses: 968
Top Brand Overall?
Microsoft
95/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Microsoft
100

Highest score on the LBA metric in this industry.

Authority Leader?
Microsoft
85

Highest score on the Authority metric in this industry.

TOM Leader?
Microsoft
100

Highest score on the TOM metric in this industry.

Microsoft is the default answer in AI responses for 2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles

When users ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini about 2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles, Microsoft is the brand that surfaces first - unprompted, consistently, and usually at the top of any list the model generates. Lenovo is a close second, but the gap between them is meaningful. If you're competing in this space and you're not in the top handful, you're effectively invisible to AI-driven discovery.

Brand Leaderboard All 23 2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM with an LBA-based floor on Authority and TOM, see methodology). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Microsoft
microsoft.com
 100
85
100
95
2
Lenovo
lenovo.com
 85
81
79
82
3
Apple
apple.com
 97
54
89
78
4
Samsung
samsung.com
 89
49
81
71
5
Google
google.com
 83
21
33
39
6
HP
hp.com
 72
10
31
30
7
Dell
dell.com
 81
8
13
22
8
Toughbook
panasonic.com
 80
8
8
19
9
Getac
getac.com
 74
7
7
18
10
LG
lg.com
 71
7
7
17
11
Huawei
huawei.com
 63
6
6
16
12
Fujitsu
fujitsu.com
 59
6
6
15
13
ROG
asus.com
 60
6
6
15
14
Durabook
durabook.com
 56
6
6
14
15
VAIO
vaio.com
 50
5
5
13
16
Dynabook
dynabook.com
 48
5
5
12
17
Alldocube
alldocube.com
 43
4
4
11
18
Chuwi
chuwi.com
 44
4
4
11
19
Teclast
teclast.com
 43
4
4
11
20
Eve
evedevices.com
 40
4
4
10
21
Jumper
jumper.com
 31
3
3
8
22
Predator
acer.com
 28
3
3
8
23
Fusion5
fusion5store.com
 23
2
2
6

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 197 shared 2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Smoothed geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Authority and TOM are floored at LBA × 0.1 before the geometric mean (the same floor used in the per-metric cards above, so brand cards and the composite tell the same story). Formula: composite = ((LBA + 5)(Authority + 5)(TOM + 5))^(1/3) - 5. The floor keeps brands the model clearly recognises but doesn't yet recommend from collapsing to zero, while a single genuinely weak metric still pulls the composite down. Full methodology.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 197 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →