Overview Leaderboard Methodology
Industry Report

2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles

Hybrid devices that function as both tablets and laptops with detachable keyboards or 360-degree hinges for flexible use.

Brands tracked: 23
Brands analyzed: 23
Last updated: 2026-04-23
Model: OpenAI GPT-5
Prompts: 197
Total responses: 968
Top Brand Overall?
Microsoft
90/100

Highest overall AI Visibility Score in this industry.

LBA Leader?
Microsoft
100

Highest score on the LBA metric.

Authority Leader?
Lenovo
81

Highest score on the Authority metric.

TOM Leader?
Microsoft
100

Highest score on the TOM metric.

Microsoft is the default answer in AI responses for 2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles

Microsoft and Lenovo together dominate AI responses for 2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles. Both brands consistently surface unprompted, with the model treating them as the default answers for most category queries. Brands outside the top two face a structural disadvantage: users are usually given these two before the model even considers alternatives.

Brand Leaderboard All 23 2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles brands ranked

Ranked by overall AI Visibility Score (geometric mean of LBA, Authority, and TOM). Click any brand for the full report.

# Brand LBA Authority TOM Overall
1
Microsoft
microsoft.com
 100
72
100
90
2
Lenovo
lenovo.com
 85
81
79
82
3
Samsung
samsung.com
 89
49
81
71
4
Apple
apple.com
 97
36
82
66
5
HP
hp.com
 72
10
31
29
6
Dell
dell.com
 81
3
13
14
7
ROG
asus.com
 60
0
4
1
8
Alldocube
alldocube.com
 43
0
0
0
9
Chuwi
chuwi.com
 44
0
0
0
10
Durabook
durabook.com
 56
0
0
0
11
Dynabook
dynabook.com
 48
0
0
0
12
E
Eve
evedevices.com
 40
0
0
0
13
Fujitsu
fujitsu.com
 59
0
0
0
14
Fusion5
fusion5store.com
 23
0
0
0
15
Getac
getac.com
 74
0
0
0
16
Google
google.com
 83
0
0
0
17
Huawei
huawei.com
 63
0
0
0
18
Jumper
jumper.com
 31
0
0
0
19
LG
lg.com
 71
0
0
0
20
Predator
acer.com
 28
0
0
0
21
Teclast
teclast.com
 43
0
0
0
22
Toughbook
panasonic.com
 80
0
0
0
23
VAIO
vaio.com
 50
0
0
0

How is this calculated? Methodology

Every brand in this leaderboard is scored against the same set of 197 shared 2-in-1 Tablets and Convertibles prompts. The same prompts, same model, same iterations. So differences in scores reflect actual differences in AI visibility, not differences in measurement.

Overall AI Visibility Score
Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM: (LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
Shared industry prompts
For Authority and TOM, all brands in the industry are scored against the same 197 category prompts (e.g. "best SEO tools for agencies"). This makes brand-to-brand comparisons valid - everyone faces identical inputs. LBA prompts are per-brand because they ask brand-specific questions.
Latent Brand Association (LBA)
5 brand probes + 1 control prompt, each run 5 times in recall mode (no web search). LBA = quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Read the full LBA methodology →
LLM Authority
50 organic category prompts (discovery, comparison, problem and transactional intents), each run once in recall mode and once in retrieval mode. Score = frequency × log-decayed prominence × intent weight, then 50/50 averaged across the two modes. Read the full Authority methodology →
Top of Mind (TOM)
15 high-volume discovery prompts (sourced from Keywords Everywhere search-volume data), each run 5 times in pure recall mode (no web). Score = frequency × (0.5 + 0.5 × log-prominence), volume-weighted. Read the full TOM methodology →