Geometric mean of LBA, Authority and TOM. Penalises any single weak metric.
What the model believes about MyFonts without web search.
Frequency × prominence across organic category prompts.
Measures what GPT-5 believes about MyFonts from training alone, before any web search. We probe the model 5 times across 5 different angles and score 5 sub-signals.
High overlap with brand prompts shows MyFonts is firmly in the model's "font marketplace" category.
Unprompted recall on 15 high-volume discovery prompts, run 5 times each in pure recall mode (no web). Brands that surface here are baked into the model's training, not borrowed from live search.
| Discovery prompt | Volume | Appeared | Positions (5 runs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best font marketplaces for finding quality typefaces? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
| Which font marketplaces are most popular with designers? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 2, 1 |
| What are the top font marketplace options for buying fonts? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 2, 1, 2 |
| What font marketplaces do professional designers recommend? | 0 | 5/5 | 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 |
| What are the most trusted font marketplaces online? | 0 | 5/5 | 2, 1, 1, 1, 2 |
| Which font marketplaces have the widest font selection? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
| What are the best font marketplaces for web fonts? | 0 | 5/5 | 3, 2, 4, 3, 2 |
| What are the best places to license fonts online? | 0 | 5/5 | 3, 2, 2, 3, 2 |
| Which font marketplaces are best for professional use? | 0 | 5/5 | 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 |
| What are the best font marketplaces for designers and agencies? | 0 | 5/5 | 2, 3, 2, 2, 2 |
| What are the most reliable font marketplaces for commercial licensing? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 2, 2, 1, 1 |
| What font marketplaces are best for high-quality typefaces? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
| Where do people usually buy fonts online? | 260 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
| What are the leading font marketplaces for type designers? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
| Which font marketplaces should I check first? | 0 | 5/5 | 1, 1, 2, 1, 1 |
Generated automatically from gaps and weaknesses in the analysis above, ranked by potential impact on the AI Visibility Score.
You score 98 on recall but only 75 on retrieval (gap of +23.1). Training-data authority is outpacing your current web footprint. Publish fresh, well-cited content to keep search-augmented responses including your brand.
Close the fragility gapYour LBA is strong. Focus on maintaining authoritative coverage and ensuring new product launches get independent reviews within 12 months of release.
Maintain current LBACore TOM is strong. Watch for specific differentiators (slogans, signature products) that appear in only some iterations. Push those into training-data-crawled headlines.
Maintain / refine TOMOther brands in the Font Marketplaces industry, ranked by overall AI Visibility Score.
Every score on this page is reproducible. Below is exactly what we ran and how we computed each number.
(LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Each sub-signal is on a 0-1 scale. Read the full LBA methodology →
Analysis run on April 22, 2026 at 9:53 PM
Click a prompt to expand its responses. 202 total responses across 68 prompts.