Measures what GPT-5 believes about Huntress from training alone, before any web search. We probe the model 5 times across 5 different angles and score 5 sub-signals.
High overlap with brand prompts shows Huntress is firmly in the model's "managed endpoint security service" category.
Unprompted recall on 15 high-volume discovery prompts, run 5 times each in pure recall mode (no web). Brands that surface here are baked into the model's training, not borrowed from live search.
| Discovery prompt | Volume | Appeared | Positions (5 runs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best managed endpoint security service providers? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which managed endpoint security services are most recommended? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the top managed endpoint security service companies? | 20 | 1/5 | 11 |
| What managed endpoint security service should I choose for my business? | 0 | 1/5 | 1 |
| What are the most popular managed endpoint security options? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which companies offer the best endpoint security management services? | 0 | 1/5 | 10 |
| What are the leading managed endpoint protection services? | 0 | 1/5 | 5 |
| Who are the top providers of managed endpoint security? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What is the best outsourced endpoint security service? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| Which endpoint security services are best for enterprises? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best endpoint security services for small businesses? | 50 | 0/5 | — |
| What managed endpoint security service companies should I compare? | 0 | 2/5 | 13, 9 |
| What are the top-rated managed endpoint security vendors? | 0 | 1/5 | 9 |
| Which managed endpoint security service is the most trusted? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best options for managed endpoint detection and response services? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
This report focuses on Managed Endpoint Security Services because that is where Huntress scores highest. The model also evaluates it against the industries below, with their own prompts and competitor sets. Click any industry for its full leaderboard.
Generated automatically from gaps and weaknesses in the analysis above, ranked by potential impact on the AI Visibility Score.
Your Authority is low across category queries. Users asking about your category do not see you. Priority: get listed in "best of" and "top N" articles for your category on domains with strong training-data crawl presence.
+10 to +25 on AuthorityThe model knows your brand when asked directly (LBA > 0) but never volunteers you in category queries. You are outside the model's go-to list. Co-mention density with established category leaders is the single biggest lever: get listed in "Top 10 X" articles alongside the brands the model currently names.
+10 to +30 on TOM over 12-18 monthsRetrieval (19) beats recall (2). Current web knows you, but training data lags. Focus on category-phrase density in authoritative sources so future training cycles pick you up.
+5 to +15 on Authority recallYour LBA is strong. Focus on maintaining authoritative coverage and ensuring new product launches get independent reviews within 12 months of release.
Maintain current LBAOther brands in the Managed Endpoint Security Services industry, ranked by overall AI Visibility Score.
Every score on this page is reproducible. Below is exactly what we ran and how we computed each number.
(LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Each sub-signal is on a 0-1 scale. Read the full LBA methodology →
Analysis run on April 22, 2026 at 11:27 PM
Click a prompt to expand its responses. 210 total responses across 72 prompts.