Measures what GPT-5 believes about Babolat from training alone, before any web search. We probe the model 5 times across 5 different angles and score 5 sub-signals.
High overlap with brand prompts shows Babolat is firmly in the model's "tennis shoe" category.
Unprompted recall on 15 high-volume discovery prompts, run 5 times each in pure recall mode (no web). Brands that surface here are baked into the model's training, not borrowed from live search.
| Discovery prompt | Volume | Appeared | Positions (5 runs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best tennis shoes for most players? | 14,800 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the top tennis shoe brands? | 170 | 5/5 | 5, 6, 6, 6, 6 |
| What are the most recommended tennis shoes? | 14,800 | 4/5 | 5, 6, 5, 7 |
| What tennis shoes are best for beginners? | 0 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best tennis shoes for men? | 6,600 | 3/5 | 5, 6, 5 |
| What are the best tennis shoes for women? | 6,600 | 0/5 | — |
| What are the best tennis shoes for wide feet? | 880 | 1/5 | 5 |
| What tennis shoes have the best grip? | 0 | 1/5 | 4 |
| What tennis shoes are most durable? | 260 | 1/5 | 3 |
| What tennis shoes are good for hard courts? | 4,400 | 2/5 | 6, 5 |
| What tennis shoes are good for clay courts? | 1,900 | 5/5 | 3, 5, 4, 4, 5 |
| What are the best lightweight tennis shoes? | 170 | 4/5 | 5, 4, 4, 6 |
| What are the best cushioned tennis shoes? | 170 | 2/5 | 6, 4 |
| What tennis shoes do advanced players prefer? | 0 | 5/5 | 5, 6, 5, 4, 8 |
| What are the best all-around tennis shoes? | 170 | 2/5 | 5, 5 |
Generated automatically from gaps and weaknesses in the analysis above, ranked by potential impact on the AI Visibility Score.
Your LBA is low. The model has limited or no specific beliefs about your brand. Focus on authoritative third-party coverage: Wikipedia, industry-specific publications, founder interviews on podcasts with transcripts, and "best of" list articles.
+10 to +25 on LBA over 12-24 monthsRetrieval (53) beats recall (24). Current web knows you, but training data lags. Focus on category-phrase density in authoritative sources so future training cycles pick you up.
+5 to +15 on Authority recallYour TOM is solid on specialty queries but weaker on broad category questions. Seed content that frames your brand in the exact phrasing users use in broad queries, not just your specialty sub-category.
+5 to +15 on TOMOther brands in the Tennis Shoes industry, ranked by overall AI Visibility Score.
Every score on this page is reproducible. Below is exactly what we ran and how we computed each number.
(LBA × Authority × TOM)^(1/3). Geometric mean is used so that any single weak metric pulls the overall score down, rather than being masked by strength elsewhere.
quality × meta × stability × share × recognition × 100. Each sub-signal is on a 0-1 scale. Read the full LBA methodology →
Analysis run on April 23, 2026 at 7:00 AM
Click a prompt to expand its responses. 81 total responses across 72 prompts.